From: Chris Ho-Stuart <> Newsgroups: nz.soc.religion,aus.religion.christian Subject: Re: Ross's evidence Date: 1 Mar 1999 07:17:33 GMT Marcelo Cantos <> wrote: > Then let's do a straw poll. I invite any atheist reading this to > comment on the following statement by Julian that started this > discussion: > > Atheists don't write garbage, just the […]
From: (St.Athanasius) Newsgroups: aus.religion.christian Subject: Re: Your church's Catholic history. Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:32:36 GMT In the Name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, the One God, Amen. Peace and grace of the Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit. Dear Sean, Greetings, sorry for the delay, I can see […]
Subject: Re: Christian language about Jews and Judaism Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 02:21:57 GMT From: (Nigel B. Mitchell) Newsgroups: aus.religion.christian I promised a couple of weeks ago to respond to Troy's list of references to Jesus and Christians in the Talmud. I spent a couple of hours at the UWA library yesterday looking at […]
From: Nigel B. Mitchell <> Newsgroups: aus.religion.christian,aus.religion,nz.soc.religion Date: Monday, 8 March 1999 11:44 Subject: Re: News: Persecution / Human Rights I wrote: >> I am not sure that this discussion of Josephus is getting us >> anywhere. I do not think that the slaughter of the innocents >> happened exactly as described in Matthew. (In […]
Subject: Re: “The True Israel”, We Are Abraham's Sons! Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 03:33:28 GMT From: (Nigel B. Mitchell) Newsgroups: aus.religion.christian On Mon, 11 Jan 1999 22:47:29 GMT, (St.Athanasius) wrote: > I will here give account for my faith as Les >has asked. This is not an account of your faith – it is […]
Subject: Re: Kjv gods word & KJV ONLYISM Date: 9 Feb 1999 13:17:24 GMT From: (Andrew Bromage) Newsgroups: aus.religion.christian G'day all. I wrote: >>The thing about a KJV Onlyist is that they believe: >> The Word of God alone = The KJV alone >>Now I suspect that you do not fall into this category. From […]
From: Chris Ho-Stuart <> Newsgroups: aus.religion.christian Date: Tuesday, 9 March 1999 9:03 Subject: Re: Questions. Any Answers? Able <> wrote: > On Mon, 08 Mar 1999 13:51:49 GMT, (The > Shadow) wrote: > > >The KJV says “Jesus was called”, not invited. Also, the Gsopel refers > >to “…the mother of Jesus was there…”, not […]
Subject: Re: Jews Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 01:03:55 +0900 From: Michael Smith <> Newsgroups: aus.religion.christian,aus.religion Nigel B. Mitchell wrote: > > In the light of my recent discussion with Greg, the following may > shed some light on my position in regard to the question of > Christian attitudes to Jews and Judaism. > […]
Subject: Re: The Sinner Returns. Date: 10 Feb 1999 23:10:12 GMT From: Chris Ho-Stuart <> Newsgroups: aus.religion.christian Troy Harris <> wrote: > c) Medical science certainly does not support imputation of the soul > at birth. Rather, it generally supports life as beginning late in the > womb- hence, abortion in later stages is still […]
From: Nigel B. Mitchell <> Newsgroups: aus.religion.christian Date: Sunday, 7 March 1999 10:56 Subject: The birth of Jesus I wrote: >>Read John 7:40-43. IMHO The passage makes no sense at all if John was >>aware of the tradition that Jesus was born in Bethlehem. Able replied: > I am sorry Nigel, but it makes perfect […]