I’m agnostic about a lot of things John Stott, the world’s leading Evangelical, often uses the general phrase ‘I’m agnostic about…’ (the authorship of Hebrews or whatever) An agnostic is simply someone who admits they don’t know everything, and that when godly scholars differ, they don’t have to pretend to be omniscient… As for prophecy, […]
EXCLUSION & EMBRACE | BOOK REVIEW Reviewed by Thomas Scarborough. Miroslav Volf begins the preface to his book Exclusion & Embrace with a question that he was once asked by J ¼rgen Moltmann, “But can you embrace a cetnik?” – that is, a Serbian fighter who has committed atrocities. To do so, argues Volf, would be […]
I wrote (in an article on inerrancy): Our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, had a ‘high’ view of Scripture. So must we. Chris responded: Rowland, I find all this to be too academic (interesting comment coming from me!), and I prefer to follow Jesus in looking at the actions and behaviours of those who follow […]
“Don” writes: Thanks for your friendly welcome. 🙂 If regarding the Bible as authoritative means I am anti-science, then ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ you have to dismiss many of the great founders of modern science as anti-science. Pascal wrote, “Except by Jesus Christ we know not what our life is, what our death is, what God is, what […]
“Don” writes: The law and the prophets is shorthand for the Old Testament, which can be easily demonstrated. Another way of referring to it was ‘Moses and the prophets’. Sometimes Jesus spelt out all three categories: Law, Prophets and Writings/Psalms (Torah, Nevim, K’tuvim = TANAKH) and used them as authoritative (Luke 24:44). Genesis is certainly […]
Note: this is the beginning of a discussion on the newsgroup aus.religion.christian. I’ll put selected excerpts on to our website, but you can follow the thread in Google if you wish… Rowland. ~~~ This is the post that Rowland requested. It is rather long, but then the case is not insubstantial. 🙂 I won’t be […]
A Catechesis* On Homosexuality *Catechesis: “A Dialogue Between Believers” (Westminster Dictionary of Theology) Written at the suggestion of the Archbishop of Canterbury by the Rt. Rev. John Shelby Spong, Bishop of the Diocese of Newark (USA) and the Rt. Rev. Peter John Lee, Bishop of the Diocese of Christ the King (Southern Africa). One hundred […]
In the ongoing struggle between evolution and creationism, says philosopher of science Michael Ruse, Darwinians may be their own worst enemy By Peter Dizikes | May 1, 2005 CREATIONISM IS ON the march in America. In states from Alabama to Pennsylvania, supporters are attempting to restrict the teaching of evolution – and introduce their current […]
One netfriend wrote: Sarcasm based on the idea that the ark was too small to take in all the animals specified, but that’s an idea that isn’t obviously true. Ken Smith responded: It depends on what you take as the scientific interpretation of “kinds”. If you get hold of Young’s concordance to the King James […]
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-t016.html http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/Jesus_God.html http://www.beliefnet.com/author/author_52.html http://www.probe.org/docs/self-und.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/christianity/features/thegoodbook/jesus/experts.shtml http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=37 http://answers.org/peter_jennings_and_jesus.html