Theology
Buying A New Bible
>>>The apostle warns us to beware of the concision. Just how little >>>effect of God on our life still qualifies me for salvation. >> >> I wrote: >>”Concision” ??? >>Please explain. Brett explained that it was a quote from Phil 3:1-3 >> >(Phil 3:1-3) Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the >same […]
The Trinity And Modalism
“Darren R Middleton” <> wrote: >I noted Mike Smith picked up on a disturbing aspect of Brett Duhig’s >theology. I have noted in the past the some of the ACST guys have used >the term of manifestation when referring to Christ’s deity. >Theologically, this is linked with modalism (Sabellius ~ third century) >which is the […]
Inerrancy And Witnesses
I don’t usually look at complicated nit-picking in which someone tries to establish the inerrancy of the Bible by very convoluted exegesis, but the length of this one struck me. “Nigel & Michelle Cunningham” <> writes: >Hi there. Excuse me for butting in, but I have answers to a couple of your >questions. They are […]
NKJV – Not Recommended
(Fbtxeniaoh) writes: >Greetings Brothers and Sisters, >Please add your baptist church website link to Freedom Baptist Temple’s >new King James Bible Website Directory. >http://members.aol.com/baptistdir/index.html Since, to the best of my knowledge, the New King James version is the only modern translation which includes in the text the verse about the three heavenly witnesses in I […]
Baptism (More)
Graeme wrote: > > “Rowland C. Croucher” <> wrote: > > >Michael Kennedy wrote: > ><> > >> My advice – GET SOME RESPECT FOR GOD. > >> And get a backbone, stand up straight and fight for the Lord’s > >> standards, and instructions to us. > > I wonder when someone is going […]
Theo-Logic
I choose to read Del’s quote of Ronald Munson as a challenge, in part because of the disappointing quality of the fallacies on display in this thread. Del wrote: [snip] > > How many > times do I have to post this?: > > “Whoever puts forward an assertion, announces a > position, or takes […]
Liberals, Evangelicals & Fundamentalists
Graeme wrote: > > “Rowland C. Croucher” <> wrote: > I don’t believe that there was any > ignorance on the part of Jesus concerning the second coming. Perhaps > your assessment of “fundamentalism” is a little astray?? Then how do you read the statement about the Son of Man not knowing the time of […]
Inerrancy Of Scripture (More)
wrote: > > G’day Nigel(s), > > “Nigel & Michelle Cunningham” <> wrote: > > >Nigel B. Mitchell wrote in message: > [snip] > >>Since the doctrine of scriptural inerrancy is unscriptural, you would > >>be better off sacrificing it before you start. <> > Most Bible references regarding the inspiration and authority of > […]
Religion: The Devil’s Ace Trump
> > “Rowland C. Croucher” <> wrote: > > >Graeme wrote: > >> > >> “Rowland C. Croucher” <> wrote: > > I fail to see what Galatians 3:28 has to do with this in any way. > Perhaps you would like to explain — or Luke 4:18,19, or Luke 11:42, > or Matthew 23:23. […]
Bible Discrepancies Revisited
>>They are scanned/OCR’d from Archer, Gleason L, Encyclopaedia of >>Bible Difficulties, Zondervan, 1982 (476 pages) > >Q: Why are such books written? >A: Because there are discrepancies and errors in the Bible, and they >need to be explained away. Close, but no cookie I’m afraid. You’re missing one vital word, which is that there are […]
Categories
Articles may be reproduced in any medium, without applying for permission
(provided they are unedited, and retain the original author/copyright information - and a reference to this website :-)!
26,756 articles online.
Protected by Akismet, Digital Ninjas and an Ion Cannon. Really.
Blog with WordPress