A ‘Net friend said:

> Lawrence Meckan wrote:

> > Mu is the only logical answer to a question that is based on an

inference

> > nobody agrees to.

>

> ok, I know I’m showing my ignorance and lack of education, but what the heck is ‘MU’? My dictionary says

> ‘the twelfth letter of the greek alphabet’. That’s all. ( I know.. I need

a better one)

It’s something out of the Jargon File, otherwise known as the New Hacker’s Dictionary.

SQ mu /moo/

The correct answer to the classic trick question “Have you stopped beating your wife yet?”. Assuming that you have no wife or you have never beaten your wife, the answer “yes” is wrong because it implies that you used to beat your wife and then stopped, but “no” is worse because it suggests that you have one and are still beating her. According to various Discordians and Douglas Hofstadter the correct answer is usually “mu”, a Japanese word alleged to mean “Your question cannot be answered because it depends on incorrect assumptions”. Hackers tend to be sensitive to logical inadequacies in language, and many have adopted this suggestion with enthusiasm. The word `mu’ is actually from Chinese, meaning `nothing’; it is used in mainstream Japanese in that sense. Native speakers do not recognize the Discordian question-denying use, which almost certainly derives from overgeneralization of the answer in the following well-known Rinzai Zen koan:

A monk asked Joshu, “Does a dog have the Buddha nature?” Joshu retorted, “Mu!” EQ – http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/mu.html

As per the definition, it is given in response to logical inadequacies in language, and I have demonstrated to Sean as to why his question remains logically inadequate.

HTH.

lawrence