From a knowledgeable friend:

According to a Times report, Deobandis control over 600 of Britain’s 1300+ mosques: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2402973.ece

The link for the article below, on the Deobandi leader and author Usmani, is: <http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2409833.ece> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2409833.ece

Usmani is one of the leading Islamic scholars living today. He has published over 60 books, including more than a dozen available in English.

Born in Deoband, he is a leading figure in the movement known as ‘Deobandi’ Muslims.

His father was the Grand Mufti of Pakistan, and he himself has served as a Sharia Judge on the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

He is deputy of the Islamic Fiqh (Jurisprudence) Council of the Organization of the Islamic Conference. (The OIC is the peak international body of Islamic nations in the world, a kind of Islamic united nations.)

Usmani serves on the shariah boards of many leading Islamic financial institutions.

This is a highly significant statement, by a leading figure in the world of *mainstream *Islamic jurisprudence.

The book this article refers to was published in English in 2005. Why has it taken so long for the Times to comment on it?

From The Times

September 8, 2007

*Our followers ‘must live in peace until strong enough to wage jihad’*

* *

Andrew Norfolk

One of the world’s most respected Deobandi scholars believes that aggressive military jihad should be waged by Muslims “to establish the supremacy of Islam” worldwide.

Justice Muhammad Taqi Usmani argues that Muslims should live peacefully in countries such as Britain, where they have the freedom to practise Islam, only until they gain enough power to engage in battle.

His views explode the myth that the creed of offensive, expansionist jihad represents a distortion of traditional Islamic thinking.

Mr Usmani, 64, sat for 20 years as a Sharia judge in Pakistan’s Supreme Court. He is an adviser to several global financial institutions and a regular visitor to Britain. Polite and softly spoken, he revealed to The Times a detailed knowledge of world events and his words, for the most part, were balanced and considered.

He agreed that it was wrong to suggest that the entire nonMuslim world was intent on destroying Islam. Yet this is a man who, in his published work, argues the case for Muslims to wage an expansionist war against nonMuslim lands.

Mr Usmani’s justification for aggressive military jihad as a means of establishing global Islamic supremacy is revealed at the climax of his book, Islam and Modernism. The work is a polemic against Islamic modernists who seek to convert the entire Koran into “a poetic and metaphorical book” because, he says, they have been bewitched by Western culture and ideology.

The final chapter delivers a rebuke to those who believe that only defensive jihad (fighting to defend a Muslim land that is under attack or occupation) is permissible in Islam. He refutes the suggestion that jihad is unlawful against a nonMuslim state that freely permits the preaching of Islam.

For Mr Usmani, “the question is whether aggressive battle is by itself commendable or not”. “If it is, why should the Muslims stop simply because territorial expansion in these days is regarded as bad? And if it is not commendable, but deplorable, why did Islam not stop it in the past?”

He answers his own question thus: “Even in those days . . . aggressive jihads were waged . . . because it was truly commendable for establishing the grandeur of the religion of Allah.”

These words are not the product of a radical extremist. They come from the pen of one of the most acclaimed scholars in the Deobandi tradition.

Mr Usmani told The Times that Islam and Modernism was an English translation of his original Urdu book, “which at times gives a connotation different from the original”.