On 1 May 2002 22:05:15 GMT, (Gregory Shearman) wrote:

[re Andrew Bolt’s article on Islam]:

}On Wed, 1 May 2002 12:30:32 +1000, Paul Abeles wrote: }> }>Excellent article, should be compulsory reading at all our unis. }>Islam is a danger to moderate democracies, do we want Allah as our dictator? } }Instead of God? } }Why was voluntary euthanasia defeated in the NT despite majority }support in the population? }

Gregory sometimes you come across as thick as a brick. On the one hand you talk about humanity reaching maturity and advocate an anarchic system and then blindly come out defending a religion that is based on intolerance and hate. How can you compare Islamic law to our liberal, albeit, Xian democracy?

}>If we encourage Muslim immigration that is what we will get………..and }>deserve. } }Rubbish. Did we all become buddhists when the Vietnamese came }here? Did we all become Greek Orthodox? }

Neither of those is a predatory, intolerant, hard line religion like Islam.

}Hysterical rubbish.

Perhaps, but if you look at the statistics, the actions of Muslims in other countries once they achieve a sizable minority/majority and their birth rates – it’s you that comes across as the pollyanna. It’s nice to play to cool disinterested intellectual, that is until the barbarians come knocking at your door. Don’t you wonder why China is crapping itself over its large Muslim population in its north?

I’d suggest you read The Lucifer Principle and get a few other books on the science of memes to understand why Islam is one of the most destructive, predatory memes we face.