// you’re reading...

Apologetics

Masturbation: (Another) Christian Perspective

This article on a Usenet newsgroup was in response to this one:

Masturbation

Re: Masturbation: A Christian Perspective

Sorry, Neill, but your interpretation of the Bible’s view on  masturbation is incorrect.

Please note that when there was a spillage of semen a person was onunclean for the evening. And that when you had normal sex that day, you were unclean for the evening because of the spillage of semen.

Please note that verse 16 of Lev. 15 talks about the simple spillage of  semen without a woman involved and this meant only being unclean until  the evening and washing one’s garments. But then in verse 18 it  specifically speaks of copulation with a woman and both being unclean.

So verse 16 refers to spillage of semen apart from sex with a woman.

The reference? MASTURBATION.   So it was no more of a sin than normal  sex with your wife.

Furthermore, it is referred euphemistically in the OT twice as “covering  one’s feet.” This was the incident when David cut the back out of  Saul’s coat when he was alone in a cave to “ease nature” as some  translations put it. But Saul wouldn’t have gone into a cave just to  use the rest room. He would have simply gone outside his tent and taken  care of that as all his soldiers did. But in order to masturbate and  relieve oneself sexually, it takes TIME and most of all PRIVACY. And  that’s why he went into the cave and that’s why David had time to cut  the back of his coat. Saul probably didn’t notice him because he was  concentrating on something else….

The other incidence of “covering one’s feet” was when King Eglon was  killed and locked up on his summer porch. His servants thinking he  wanted privacy for a while thought he was “covering his feet” or  masturbating in private until they finally broke in to check on him and  found him dead.

The euphemism, “covering one’s feet” comes from the Jewish practice of  standing while masturbating in a private place and thus the need to  cover one’s feet in order to protect it from falling semen. Of course,  as you pointed out, semen soils the clothes and anything it touches so  if one were really careful, they could get away with a minimal of  ceremonial uncleaness and not have to bathe if no semen touched their  flesh but fell to the ground on a cloth covering their feet. So it  became known as “covering one’s feet.”

But the fact is, men have desires and when they release semen it  relieves sexual tension. How many wives complain their husbands  masturbate and ignore them? If boys were required to masturbate  a half hour before going on dates in order to lower their sexual drive  how many dates would be broken? Lots!

Thus, when men are single and the semen builds up, they are more prone  to temptation since the desire gets stronger as the semen builds up.  So Paul encouraged Christians to very modestly learn how to relieve  themselves (masturbate) in order not to be tempted into fornication  by trying to ignore natural sexual desires. But he didn’t mean that  one was to fantasize about immorality but only sexuality under normal  Christian circumstances. Thus the Bible not only condones masturbation,  but RECOMMENDS it to help control sexual desires and temptation for  those who do not have that outlet normally with a wife.

Here is the specific reference to MASTURBATION in the NT, which is  called euphemistically, “to get a hand on one’s vessel”:

1 Thess. 4:3:  “For this is what God wills, the sanctifying of you, that you abstain  from fornication”.

(NOTE THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WILL HELP THEM ABSTAIN FROM FORNICATION).

4 “that each one of you should know how to get possession of his own  vessel with sanctification and honor…”

THAT IS, THAT EACH ONE SHOULD LEARN HOW TO MASTURBATE (HOLD ONE’S  VESSEL, HOLD ONE’S ORGAN) IN A WAY THAT IS APPROPRIATE. SANCTIFICATION  AND HONOR ARE BOTH TERMS RELATED TO “MARITAL”… THUS ONE SHOULD LEARN  TO MASTURBATE IN AN HONORABLE, NOT DISHONORABLE WAY…BUT HE  CONTINUES…

5. “Not in covetous sexual appetite such as also those nations have which do not know God.”

“COVETOUS SEXUAL APPETITE” MEANS WANTING SOMETHING THAT YOU SHOULD HAVE.  BASICALLY, FOR CHRISTIANS, WANTING ANY TYPE OF SEXUAL ACTIVITY THAT A  CHRISTIAN WOULD NOT APPROVE. SO SINCE SOME FANTASY THOUGHTS ARE  INVOLVED WITH MASTURBATION, THE CHRISTIAN IS BEING TOLD HE SHOULD NOT  FANTASIZE ABOUT ANYTHING THAT A CHRISTIAN WOULD NOT ORDINARILY DO  SEXUALLY. IN OTHER WORDS, JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN RELIEVE YOURSELF THIS  WAY, YOU SHOULDN’T USE THIS AS AN EXCUSE TO FANTASIZE ABOUT BEING PICKED  UP AT A SINGLE’S BAR BY TWO OR THREE GIRLS AND HAVING AN ORGY!!! THAT  WOULD BE “COVETOUS” OF THE WRONG THING. INSTEAD, THE FANTASY COULD BE  ABOUT ANY CHRISTIAN SETTING, SUCH AS YOUR WIFE IS ON A BUSINESS TRIP FOR TWO  MONTHS AND SHE’S JUST GETTING BACK ON THE PLANE TONIGHT, SO YOU DECIDE  SINCE YOU HAVEN’T SEEN HER IN A LONG TIME THAT YOU’LL PICK HER UP WITH  THE VAN INSTEAD OF THE TWO-SEAT SPORTS CAR, AND YOU CONVENIENTLY PARK IN  THE OVERNIGHT DISCOUNT PARKING SECTION….

But one thing Paul definitely warns against, are others trying to tell  you how to do this!!! It is so easy to make rules. And a persons  conscience before God is his own. So how often or what thoughts, etc.  is left up to the individual Christian with the above guidelines.

Here’s the warning in the next verse:

6 “that NO ONE go to the point of harming and encroach upon the RIGHTS  of his brother in this matter.. because God is one who exacts punishment  for these things…”

That is, it is not the Church’s or anybody else’s right to tell a  Christian not to masturbate if he feels a need to to relieve his sexual  tensions, nor to try to regulate him, since this might stumble him and  these are his PERSONAL MATTERS. These are his RIGHTS to do so with his  own conscience before God.

So in conclusion, MASTURBATION, is suggested as an activity which might  spill semen apart from sex with a woman at Lev. 15:16 and the only  consequence was simply ceremonial uncleanness for the day, the same as  normal intercourse with a woman. Even when a woman had her menstrual  cycle she was unclean. So this was considered natural. And since  masturbation can help to regulate natural sexual desires, Paul  recommends it to help reduce the temptation for fornication. It makes a  big difference is a Christian is always fighting back desires and trying  not to masturbate all the time than when he simply takes care of this  urge in a simple manner on a regular basis so he can focus on more  spiritual things, keeping his thoughts appropriately in line with  Christian sexuality.

It is not dirty. It is not unclean.

On the other hand, many know that there is a great failure rate in  trying not to dwell on sexuality when one is trying to stay completely  aesexual and this sometimes leads to excessive sexual-related  preoccupations that can be dangerous.

Bottom line is that the natural build-up of semen definitely increases  the sexual urge but afer release of semen the sexual urge is greatly  diminished. So it is a practical exercise for Christians to help  control their desires, particularly for HOMOSEXUALS who might not  otherwise be fulfilled in a material relationship. When someone is  holding all their sexual urges until marriage the temptation for  fornication is much greater. But for those who can masturbate without  guilt, they may not even want or need to get married since it is  sufficiently satisfying to take care of that urge. The primary issue is  not being tempted by one’s desires. For those who need more, there is  marriage with the opposite sex, even for gays. Modest masturbation can  be a saving gift for those who choose to be single since in reality it  gets their mind off sex and they don’t spend all their time feeling  guilty and being tempted and facing trying to control natural urges.

They can just GO WITH THE FLOW, enjoy themselves for a few moments and  feel relieved from sexual tensions for the moment and go on with their  lives. The only precaution is not to use this to cultivate sexual  appetite. It is supposed to DECREASE desire not increase it.

IN PRACTICE it works since in order to create a sensual fantasy  involving a wife takes a certain amount of controlled energy and that  diminishes the capacity for excessive masturbation since it takes brain  power and the level of excitability drastically reduces immediately  after the first emission.

So it is much more difficult to create arousal when your fantasies are  limited to a marital situation after the first or second time. Whereas  it is quite easy to do so after a few days since very little fantasy is  needed because the natural excitability is so high in direct relation to  the build-up of semen. Between the two, therefore, there is a happy  medium of regulation without the temptation to excessive sexual  appetite. But still, no Christian is to impose their views on this upon  any other. That is a private issue for each Christian.

Thanks for considering the BIBLE’s VIEW of MASTURBATION.

Posted anonymously

~~~

The article on this issue with the most referrals: http://www.jmm.org.au/articles/4884.htm

Discussion

4 comments for “Masturbation: (Another) Christian Perspective”

  1. John I agree with you; I believe masturbation to be a total sin because i almost always lust. but it doesn’t mean I see myself ever being able to stop…

    Posted by dandyd032000 | April 29, 2012, 4:30 pm
  2. First of all, I’m not saying that I am the definitive authority on anything. And masturbation is something that I struggle with, but God’s helping me through it. So here’s some thoughts that came to me as I read through this comment.

    Firstly Leviticus 15:16 does identify that the same regulations apply for an emission of semen to a man lying alone as do to a man lying with a woman. But masturbation is not the only way that semen can be released from a man who is lying alone – what about wet dreams, or ‘nocturnal emissions’ if you prefer – how do you know this passage isn’t just referring to that?

    I found the whole ‘covering the feet’ thing very interesting, and you’re probably right. I’d never heard it all before, and it was interesting to read. And possibly King Saul and King Eglon were masturbating, or thought to be masturbating. But any small amount of looking into either of these characters shows that they’re not the kind of Bible characters put there for us to emulate, copy or make role models of! Both were killed and had their kingdom taken away from them because of their corruption. I’m not saying masturbation was all this corruption – it was mostly things such as ignoring God, relying on their own power to run the country, ignoring the cases of the needy, etc…but while they probably did masturbate, they also did a lot of other things that we wouldn’t want to make an example of!

    And now, finally, we come to 1 Thessalonians 4:3,4. While it does say to “possess your own vessel” in the KJV and NKJV, the words used in Greek here are very ambiguous and hard to translate. The word is the same as the one Paul uses for his famous “We have this treasure in jars of clay (or earthen vessels)” illustration in 2 Corinthians 4:17. It’s also the same word as 1 Peter 3:7 when a man’s wife is called the weaker partner, or weaker vessel. So the word can mean vessel (or container), jar, body or wife. Nowhere in there do I see the possibly meaning of penis. Paul was a very straightforward, direct kind of man – if he thought something, he said it. He wouldn’t have used an ambiguous euphemism, he would have just gone ahead and said penis if that’s what he meant. Other translations say that this verse means “take control of your body” or “learn to live with your wife,” both of which would help to stop sexual temptation without using masturbation.

    These are my views on it, and I completely agree with 1 Thessalonians 4:6, and I’m not going to encroach upon your rights, as my brothers, by forcing you to believe what I say. But this is my interpretation.

    I believe God can help men to live virtuously with either less frequent masturbation or without it at all. It’s something that I’m still struggling with, and I’ll readily admit that. But as for now, I’m pretty convicted that my life is better without it, and if I’m wrong, I’d rather err on the side of caution. Also, if I’m wrong, I’m confident that God will reveal that to me.

    Blessings, brothers.

    Posted by John 3.30 | October 12, 2011, 10:51 am
  3. definitely a new perspective for me. I always have felt guilty, but I think at some point we just have to accept the realities of being a man.

    hopefully others will discover this as well so that we might all be stronger in our faith

    Posted by dandyd032000 | August 26, 2011, 6:35 pm
  4. Wow! What a revelation. “Covering one’s feet” logic is something I cannot dismiss. I instinctively always seemed to believe that the Bible is way more straight forward about all of life’s issues and therefore was more sexual than most people want to believe. This explains a lot. I look forward to possessing my vessel with HONOUR. It’s a release to be a balanced person.

    Posted by derdeitscher | January 25, 2011, 2:15 pm

Post a comment