L E A D E R S H I P W E E K L Y

Your Practical, Digital Guide to Christian Leadership

From Leadership journal and ChristianityToday.com —————————————————————– Web site: http://LeadershipJournal.net/ AOL Keyword: Leadership Journal

Thursday, February 13, 2003

POMOS VS. MODS: THE SMACKDOWN

————————-Advertisement————————— INTRODUCING LIFE TOGETHER SMALL GROUP CURRICULUM Get a FREE Sample of the new Life Together small group curriculum–a unique, life-changing curriculum based on 5 biblical purposes. This 36-week study builds on Rick Warren’s, The Purpose Driven Life. Sign up for a FREE consultation with Brett Eastman, champion of small groups and leadership development at both Willowcreek and Saddleback Churches. Space is limited–act now! http://www.lifetogether.com/freecopy.htm —————————————————————–

Hello, Friend.

Kevin Miller is back along with some of your responses to his rant on postmodernism. Our online poll last week showed that 73 percent of respondents agreed that the cultural shift is real and should be taken seriously. Only 15 percent called postmodernism a fad. Still, the debate generated lots of response on both sides. We continue the discussion here with the hope of shedding light (not just heat) on the world in which we live and minister. Next week, we’ll have additional insight from a leading exponent of postmodern ministry.

Also new this week:

* An Honest Sermon. So many sources, so little credit. Two preachers ask how we can use fairly other people’s stuff in the pulpit.

* Voice your choice. Is the use of others’ words and ideas in a sermon without credit stealing?

* And from the CT newsdesk: younger Hispanics are migrating to Protestant churches.

Until next week, Eric Reed Leadership Managing Editor

Give the gift of Leadership Weekly–it’s free. Simply forward your copy to friends and let them decide. To subscribe: http://ChristianityToday.com/go/leadership

LEADER’S INSIGHT

POMOS VS. MODS: THE SMACKDOWN You responded–boy, did you respond–to “Nomo Pomo.”

Two weeks ago I had the temerity to publish “A Postmodern Rant,” which ignited from readers a burst of rhetorical fireworks stunning in its color and intensity. A glimpse:

Mods on Pomos: “PoMoism is an overblown reaction that has no future because it can’t create anything. It is reactionary and empty. It is now primarily the domain of middle-class American university students. As I’ve traveled and talked with students in Beijing and Sao Paulo and Manila and dozens of other cities on other continents, I’ve noticed that none of them are interested in postmodernism. Most of the world would love to be modern! Even in America, I’ve never heard African-Americans or Hispanics getting excited about PoMo ministry.”

Pomos on Mods: “Probably the greatest damage the Modern church has created is the Christian subculture that is absolutely maddening. Among its contributions are bumper- sticker theology with such gems as “Get Right…or Get Left.” Or how ’bout the CCM industry with its superstars churning out meaningless dribble in a wannabe attempt to imitate secular music? Christian art is oxymoronic at best. Have you been in your local Christian bookstore lately? … Perhaps next month, someone will market a Bible for fat teens who eat too much at McDonald’s … Then there is the beatification of the Republican Party. If I were a registered Democrat, I wouldn’t be caught dead in most Modern churches. The current model for church leadership is CEO-like rather than Christ-like. I get a kick out of seeing our pastors in district meetings trying to out-PDA one another. Is this the church that is the hope of the world?”

Pomos on Kevin Miller: “What a party pooper. He’s like the sulky kid who hates change” and “Deal with it” and “Don’t be so pomophobic.”

I’ll spare you the remaining 16,479 words in the file.

Reading the emails, I realized that when the word “postmodern” is applied to “ministry,” it means too many things. Defining two primary meanings will allow me to clarify what I’m for and against.

1. “Postmodern ministry” means a ministry intentionally influenced by postmodern theory.

Briefly stated–though much more could be said– postmodernism, an academic theory popular in literature and philosophy departments over the past 30 years, challenges truth-claims as personally or socially derived. Pomo theory attacks modernism’s reliance on so-called objectivity, and more broadly, its overconfidence in reason, its mechanistic approaches, its individualism, its arrogance.

No one wrote me to defend postmodern theory. I don’t know why. So in order to clarify my position, I’m left to present the case for postmodern theory as PPMs (proponents of postmodern ministry) I’ve read have made it:

Case: Postmodern theory levels the playing field. Under modernism, Christianity has been spat upon by the scientists, higher critics, and even co-opted religious leaders, who tried to expunge its superstition from rational discourse and from society. Now our truth-claim is just as valid as any other. We can even bring mystery and mysticism back into the conversation.

My take: True, but though pomo theory seemingly makes Christianity just as valid as any other truth-claim, it really makes Christianity just as suspect as any other truth-claim. Long-term, postmodern theory merely moves Christianity from a suspect intellectual system to a routine tribal experience. Better for Christianity to be despised and persecuted under modernism than to be “elevated” to one claim among many–a position shattered by the words of Jesus.

Case: Modernism promoted radical autonomy, while postmodernism underscores that “you cannot obtain truth if you aren’t participating in community.”

My take: Of course, we need the community in discerning the truth; that’s what church and tradition are all about. But communities can be just as deceived as individuals, and even more evil, as Scott Peck points out in “People of the Lie.” When a PPM author writes, without comment, “A new concept of truth has emerged: community equals truth,” I can’t help but think, “Remember there was great community among the Gestapo, the Nixon administration, and the execs at Enron.”

Case: Postmodern theory has the salutary effect of making us humble about our pronouncements, and the modern church desperately needs a dose of humility.

My take: I agree that the modern church–actually, more often the modern parachurch–can be shrill. But what is the better foundation for humility: a cynicism about any truth- claim, even our own, or our creaturely status before God? The surest path to humility is not through postmodern theory but through the ancient Christian discipline of silence. Nearly 20 years ago, Eugene Peterson reminded us that rather than ask, “How many people have I talked to about Christ this week?” we should ask, “How many people have I listened to in Christ this week?”

I fully grant that despite many Christians’ love for it, the Enlightenment was a flawed philosophical foundation for Christianity. But I fail to see how postmodernism offers one much better. PPMs are at their best when they draw not from current, secular postmodern theory but from ancient, Christian, pre-modern theology.

2. “Postmodern ministry” means an alternative approach to ministry, one that tries to avoid the excesses of modernism.

This is what people defended with passion, apparently reading my rant as though I’m against new or alternative models. I’m not. Just the opposite, in fact. My church could be described as ancient/future; it involves sacrament, mystery, and symbol, and it joins Anglo, Hispanic, African, and Gen-Y congregations. Moreover, if my 18-year-old son chooses to stay within Christianity, as I pray, it will probably be in a pomo expression of it. So I’m cheering for new models to succeed. (Though my daughter will probably do fine in a more-modern expression, and such, thankfully, will abound.)

The reason I ranted for PPMs to stop modernist-bashing was not primarily because it’s tiresome but because it diverts energy from the more difficult work of birthing new approaches to ministry, which the church desperately needs. If the modernist church is dead, as some PPMs claim, why stand at the graveside, yelling at the deceased? PPMs are at their best when they draw energy not from hatred of the modern church but from love of postmodern nonChristians. Thus, I like writers such as Rick Richardson (Evangelism Outside the Box) and Tony Jones (a chapter in Stories of Emergence), who offer guidance for reaching today’s culture.

Therefore, at the risk of disappointing those on both sides who may like me to serve as Pomo Enemy #1, I give this response: “If nominated, I will not run, and if elected, I will not serve.” My real point is Nomo Basho.

For example, I picked up the just-released book by Brian McLaren and Tony Campolo, “Adventures in Missing the Point: How the Culture-Controlled Church Neutered the Gospel.” The cover says “This book isn’t about pointing fingers,” but the text, while sometimes confessional, mostly jabs the modern evangelical church. I agreed with most of the book’s critiques but have to ask: PPMs call us to “drop our affair with certainty and argument,” but is this title not the epitome of certainty and argument? PPMs call us to enter dialogue–but would those who most need to hear this want to enter a conversation framed that way? PPMs call us to recapture the arts and beauty, but this title uses one of the ugliest words in the language.

Having made far too much of a title, let me hasten to say I loved the book’s chapter (by McLaren) on being postmodern. These outtakes express what I believe and hope that both mods and pomos will read and heed:

“Let’s talk about the term postmodern. Nearly everybody is sick of it. And no wonder, since it is used in a jillion different ways. . . . Another reason for widespread fatigue with the term postmodern: people like me who talk about the subject too often indulge in facile dualisms. This is so modern, we say with self-impressed arrogance, and that is so postmodern. Such facile contrast is not only annoying, but stupid. . . .I’d rather be a humble modern than a snobbish postmodern any day. Better yet, I’d rather be a humble Christian seeking to do God’s will in our fast-changing world in harmony and collaboration with all God’s people (whatever their taste in eras).”

Amen and amen.

–Kevin A. Miller is editor-at-large of Leadership. He will be attending the Emergent Convention (http://www.EmergentConvention.com) and continue this conversation.

To respond, write to

————————–Advertisement————————– PREACHING TODAY AUDIO SERIES Discover what makes great preaching great by listening to these outstanding sermons from some of today’s most effective Christian communicators. Each month, you’ll receive two powerful sermons and a workshop with a respected homiletics expert to keep you enriched and inspired.

http://store.yahoo.com/cgi-bin/clink?cti+oEvxaA+preactodansu.html —————————————————————–

WHAT’S NEW AT LEADERSHIPJOURNAL.NET

AN HONEST SERMON http://ChristianityToday.com/le/2003/002/2.32.html Plagiarism, the pulpit, and how to appropriate others’ ideas appropriately.

Last spring Edward Mullins, rector of Christ Church Cranbrook, served a 90-day suspension issued by the Episcopal Diocese of Michigan. He was being investigated for an increasingly common but confusing charge–plagiarism. Mullins’s messages were found conspicuously similar to the words of Jim Cymbala, Texas pastor Phil Ware, and sources from the Online Pulpit.

Mullins’s story has served as a catalyst for the debate about preaching and plagiarism. Some have declared Mullins’s actions unethical and Mullins himself unfit for pastoral ministry. Indeed, just a few months prior to Mullins’s suspension, the pastor of Central Presbyterian Church in Clayton, Missouri, resigned after admitting to homiletic plagiarism.

Others have rushed to Mullins’s defense, such as a church member quoted in the New York Times: “People come to church for his sermons, whether they’re his, they’re incorporated, or however he does it. He puts the message forth that needs to be put forth.”

Others have claimed that what he did was perfectly legal–after all, he paid for the online sermon material. In fact, the Internet has made “borrowing” sermon material from others far easier. And, perhaps, more common.

Read the rest of this article: http://ChristianityToday.com/le/2003/001/2.32.html

—— CASE STUDY: RELIABLE SOURCES http://ChristianityToday.com/le/2003/001/27.35.html When sermon prep is more appropriation than inspiration, how much credit should a preacher give to sources?

RESOURCES YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT

LEADERSHIP JOURNAL MAGAZINE http://ChristianityToday.com/magsubs/index.taf?_function=start&cc=l_bump This practical, quarterly journal is for both professional pastors and lay leaders. You’ll find wisdom, humor, and much more to encourage your ministry.

CHRISTIANITY TODAY NEWS

DESPITE PROTESTANT GROWTH, HISPANIC CATHOLICISM HOLDS STEADY IN U.S. http://ChristianityToday.com/ct/2003/105/53.0.html Younger generations leaving for Protestant churches, but immigrants make up difference.

WEBLOG: LEAKED CHINESE DOCUMENT ORDERS ‘TERMINATING ILLEGAL CHRISTIAN ACTIVITIES’ http://ChristianityToday.com/ct/2003/105/52.0.html Plus: EU draft constitution doesn’t mention God despite members’ lobbying, and other stories from online sources around the world.

To receive daily news and more, visit: http://ChristianityToday.com/go/ctdirect

WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING

LAST WEEK’S POLL RESULTS Clergy Ethics and Honesty Gallup says public ranks clergy fourth, behind nurses, military, and teachers, a 12-point drop in one year. How do you feel?

I trust my pastor(s), I can’t speak for others: 32% Survey is accurate, clergy are less honest today: 24% Public opinion will improve as sex scandals pass: 22% Polls, schmolls. Who cares what surveys say: 10% Clergy ethics are unchanged, only polls change: 6% Under spotlight, clergy are more ethical today: 3%

THIS WEEK’S POLL QUESTION GIVING CREDIT: Sermons are a patchwork of research and inspiration. What kind of oral “footnotes” do you expect? (Choose all that apply.)

I expect same citations as research paper or news report. Full annotation for every quote, stat, and idea. Credit by name for direct quotes only. General acknowledgement, “As one commentator said….” Credit sermons and outlines to original authors. Keep citations brief, too much clutters the sermon. Publish the references in the bulletin only. If pastor purchased the material, no credit needed. There are few new ideas. Most citations are unnecessary.

Go to http://ChristianityToday.com/leaders/index.html#poll to cast your vote. See how your answer compares to others’.

ILLUSTRATION OF THE WEEK

C. S. LEWIS ON LOVING GOD FIRST

At the end of a long letter, C. S. Lewis wrote: “When I have learnt to love God better than my earthly dearest, I shall love my earthly dearest better than I do now. Insofar as I learn to love my earthly dearest at the expense of God and instead of God, I shall be moving toward the state in which I shall not love my earthly dearest at all. When first things are put first, second things are not suppressed but increased.”

Citation: C. S. Lewis, Pruetts.com

For more illustrations, visit: http://PreachingToday.com/

—————————————————————– Visit this week’s advertisers:

INTRODUCING LIFE TOGETHER SMALL GROUP CURRICULUM http://www.lifetogether.com/freecopy.htm

PREACHING TODAY AUDIO SERIES http://store.yahoo.com/cgi-bin/clink?cti+oEvxaA+preactodansu.html —————————————————————-

—————————————————————– LEADERSHIP WEEKLY Delivered free via e-mail to subscribers every week. We encourage you to distribute this newsletter freely and ask only that you not change its contents. Subscribe to more free newsletters: http://ChristianityToday.com/go/newsletter/

Subscribe to Christianity Today magazine: http://ChristianityToday.com/go/lemag-leadership/

Read our privacy policy: http://ChristianityToday.com/help/features/privacy.html

ChristianityToday.com help & info: http://ChristianityToday.com/help/

To advertise in this newsletter:

—————————————————————– SUBSCRIBE: Complete the form at our Web site: http://ChristianityToday.com/go/leadership/

UNSUBSCRIBE: Note: You are currently subscribed as: —————————————————————–

PLEASE DO NOT SEND POSTINGS OR COMMENTS TO THIS LIST- ITS SOLE PURPOSE IS TO DISTRIBUTE THIS NEWSLETTER.

—————————————————————– Copyright  © 2003 ChristianityToday.com, Christianity Today International-all rights reserved.