Chris Ho-Stuart <> wrote in message . > Rowland Croucher <> wrote:
>
> > Just received this from UK – from Selwyn Hughes, (via a friend of his
and > > mine)
> > who says this is reliable.
> >
> > Whatever our views about Bush (and I have joked about his ignorance on
some > > things) let us pray for him – and those he influences…
>
> *Should* the president of the USA be an evangelist? I suggest definitely
> not.
>
> There is an ugly side to this religious fervour — exemplified by
> the previous Bush president, and his remarks on how atheists should
> not be considered good citizens of the USA.
>
> Cheers — Chris
And yet, and yet…
Here’s the first para in this week’s Time article by Michael Kinsley, ‘Don’t Want to Convert? Just Say No’ (Feb. 19, p. 34):
‘If I think a movie you plan to see is lousy and I attempt to spare you a couple of hours of boredom by talking you into a better flick, that is generally considered a friendly gesture. But if I think your spiritual beliefs are in error and I attempt to spare you an eternity of hellfire by converting you to a different set of beliefs, that is widely considered a terrible insult.’
BTW strictly speaking, of course, every American President – and everyone else living in society and communicating with others – is an evangelist for something or other. It’s _proselytizing_ as distinct from _evangelizing_ that’s problematical for many.
Rowland Croucher
Discussion
No comments for “Evangelism”