// you’re reading...

Internet

Usenet ‘Tit-For-Tats’


Rowland Croucher wrote:


> Lawrence Meckan <> wrote in message


> .


> > Gus <> said:


> > > Oh by the way LOL,


> > >


> > > Rowland knew who sent the post, it didn’t seem to bother him. Only


> > > small-minded people are preoccupied with the author of posts. Both you


> and


> > > Nigel seem very worried about it.


> >


> > I prefer people to be honest, and not change their header every month or


> > so just to miss killfiles.


>


> I prefer to have interesting/useful/helpful/irenic discussions rather than


> be bothered by ‘yes you did / no you didn’t / yes you did’ nonsense… All


> that belongs to primary school-yards…



>


> (Climbs down from his high horse 🙂


>


> —


>


> Shalom! Rowland Croucher


>


> Director, John Mark Ministries: counseling and consulting services for


> pastors, ex-pastors, church leaders and managers


> http://jmm.aaa.net.au (5400+ articles)


> http://priscillasfriends.org/ (Pastors’ wives)



You are more than capable of interesting/useful/helpful/irenic discussions, since you have the knowledge, ability, and interest for them. Others are not. Usernet is “different strokes for different folks”. Some may find the ‘tit-for-tats’ entertaining or amusing. (this is commentary, not criticism)




— rgds,


Pete

Discussion

No comments for “Usenet ‘Tit-For-Tats’”

Post a comment