Rowland Croucher wrote:
> Lawrence Meckan <> wrote in message
> .
> > Gus <> said:
> > > Oh by the way LOL,
> > >
> > > Rowland knew who sent the post, it didn’t seem to bother him. Only
> > > small-minded people are preoccupied with the author of posts. Both you
> and
> > > Nigel seem very worried about it.
> >
> > I prefer people to be honest, and not change their header every month or
> > so just to miss killfiles.
>
> I prefer to have interesting/useful/helpful/irenic discussions rather than
> be bothered by ‘yes you did / no you didn’t / yes you did’ nonsense… All
> that belongs to primary school-yards…
>
> (Climbs down from his high horse 🙂
>
> —
>
> Shalom! Rowland Croucher
>
> Director, John Mark Ministries: counseling and consulting services for
> pastors, ex-pastors, church leaders and managers
> http://jmm.aaa.net.au (5400+ articles)
> http://priscillasfriends.org/ (Pastors’ wives)
You are more than capable of interesting/useful/helpful/irenic discussions, since you have the knowledge, ability, and interest for them. Others are not. Usernet is “different strokes for different folks”. Some may find the ‘tit-for-tats’ entertaining or amusing. (this is commentary, not criticism)
— rgds,
Pete
Discussion
No comments for “Usenet ‘Tit-For-Tats’”